Scheduled

Investigating Students’ Informal Use of AI Tools during University English Classes

Authors

1

Reni Apriani

Universitas La Tansa Mashiro

2

Shibani Basu Dubey

The Bhopal School of Social Sciences, BSSS, Bhopal, India

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools has transformed how university students engage with English learning, often beyond formal instructional designs. This qualitative study investigates students’ informal use of AI tools during university English classes and examines how they interpret the role of these tools in shaping their learning experiences and classroom engagement. Drawing on classroom observations and semi-structured interviews, the study explores the ways students independently integrate AI tools such as translation, paraphrasing, and generative assistance to support comprehension, participation, and task completion in real time. The findings reveal that students employ AI tools strategically to manage linguistic challenges, maintain engagement, and enhance confidence, while simultaneously negotiating concerns related to overreliance and academic norms. Students generally perceive AI as a supportive, complementary resource rather than a substitute for instruction or effort. By foregrounding informal and learner-initiated AI use, this study contributes to current discussions on AI integration in English language education, highlighting the importance of recognizing students’ everyday practices and perspectives when developing pedagogical and policy responses to AI-enhanced learning environments.

Publication Info

Volume / Issue
Vol. 2, No. 1
Year
2026
Pages
82-99
Submitted
24 February 2026
Published
01 June 2026

Original Article

View this article on the original journal website for additional features and citation options.

View in OJS

Share

Publication History

Transparent editorial process timeline

Submitted

24 Feb 2026

Sent to Review

25 Feb 2026

Review Completed

18 Mar 2026

Review Completed

20 Mar 2026

Revisions Required

20 Mar 2026

Editorial Decision

02 May 2026

Review Completed

05 May 2026

Review Completed

05 May 2026

Accepted

05 May 2026

Sent to Production

06 May 2026

Published

01 Jun 2026