Published

The Effect of Metacognitive-Based Deep Learning Models in Mathematics Learning on the Academic Resilience of Elementary School Students

Authors

1

Muhammad Bayu

Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

2

Shinta Mutiara Dewi

Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

Abstract

Mathematics learning at the elementary level is often associated with anxiety and low academic resilience, which may hinder students’ persistence and performance. Strengthening resilience through innovative instructional models is therefore essential. This study aims to examine the effect of a Metacognitive-Based Deep Learning model on the academic resilience of elementary school students in mathematics. A quantitative true experimental design with a posttest-only control group was employed. The sample consisted of 120 fourth- and fifth-grade students divided equally into experimental and control groups. Data were collected using a 20-item mathematical resilience questionnaire measuring value, struggle, growth, and perseverance. Confirmatory Factor Analysis using PLS-SEM confirmed the validity and reliability of the instrument. Data were analyzed through an independent samples t-test, Cohen’s d effect size, and two-way ANOVA. The results revealed a highly significant difference between groups (p < .001), with a mean difference of 24.233 points and a very large effect size (d = 3.46). The findings indicate that the intervention consistently improved students’ academic resilience across grade levels without significant interaction effects. This study contributes theoretically by reinforcing the role of deep learning integrated with metacognitive strategies in developing non-cognitive competencies in elementary education. Practically, it offers an evidence-based instructional alternative to enhance students’ resilience and reduce mathematics anxiety.

Publication Info

Volume / Issue
Vol. 2, No. 2
Year
2026
Pages
14-28
Submitted
23 February 2026
Published
27 February 2026

Original Article

View this article on the original journal website for additional features and citation options.

View in OJS

Share

Publication History

Transparent editorial process timeline

Submitted

23 Feb 2026

Review Completed

24 Feb 2026

Sent to Review

24 Feb 2026

Review Completed

25 Feb 2026

Revisions Required

25 Feb 2026

Accepted

26 Feb 2026

Sent to Production

26 Feb 2026

Published

27 Feb 2026