Scheduled

Exploring Students’ Use of AI Translation and Paraphrasing Tools during Academic Reading

Authors

1

Endang Siti Nurkholidah

Universitas Sindang Kasihh Majalengka

2

Shafiq ur Rehman

University of Doha For Science and Technology, Qatar

Abstract

The increasing availability of AI translation and paraphrasing tools offers new possibilities for supporting English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ academic reading. This issue is particularly relevant in university contexts where students are required to engage with complex English academic texts yet often encounter linguistic and conceptual difficulties. This study aims to investigate how university students use AI translation and paraphrasing tools across the before-reading, during-reading, and after-reading stages of academic reading and to examine how these stage-specific uses support students’ meaning-making processes. Using a qualitative exploratory design, data were collected from 20 university students who were familiar with AI-assisted reading practices through think-aloud protocols, reading journals, and semi-structured interviews, and were analyzed thematically. Findings reveal that students engage with AI tools in a strategic and reflective manner, employing translation for lexical support, paraphrasing for structural simplification, and both tools for reflective consolidation. Students’ use of AI was stage-specific: pre-reading translation enabled previewing and activation of prior knowledge; during reading, paraphrasing supported comprehension monitoring and verification; after reading, students consolidated understanding through summarization and clarification. The study highlights that AI tools function as both cognitive and metacognitive scaffolds, extending learners’ capacity to navigate complex academic texts while promoting learner agency and self-directed reading. These insights offer practical implications for integrating AI tools into academic literacy instruction and suggest avenues for future research on longitudinal effects, disciplinary differences, and adaptive strategies for diverse proficiency levels.

Publication Info

Volume / Issue
Vol. 2, No. 1
Year
2026
Pages
62-81
Submitted
01 February 2026
Published
01 June 2026

Original Article

View this article on the original journal website for additional features and citation options.

View in OJS

Share

Publication History

Transparent editorial process timeline

Submitted

01 Feb 2026

Sent to Review

03 Feb 2026

Review Completed

02 Mar 2026

Review Completed

28 Mar 2026

Revisions Required

29 Mar 2026

Editorial Decision

02 May 2026

Review Completed

05 May 2026

Review Completed

06 May 2026

Accepted

06 May 2026

Sent to Production

06 May 2026

Published

01 Jun 2026