Published

Discourse Markers in Learners’ YouTube Comments: A Study of Informal Academic English

Authors

1

Raudhatul Haura

Universitas Islam Kalimantan (UNISKA) Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

2

Aloba Fatimah Musa

Kwara State Universal Basic Education

Abstract

This study investigates the use of discourse markers (DMs) by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in YouTube comments on academic-related videos. Drawing on Fraser’s typology, the research explores the types of DMs most frequently used and how learners employ them to structure arguments, express stance, and maintain coherence in informal academic English. A total of 300 learner comments, some from the same users, were collected from ten academic YouTube videos and analysed through qualitative content analysis. The findings reveal that learners primarily used contrastive, elaborative, and inferential discourse markers such as but, also, and therefore to organize ideas and express reasoning. Stance-related markers like I think and actually were also prevalent, signaling learners' personal evaluations. Additionally, elaborative markers contributed to textual flow and coherence. These patterns indicate that EFL learners are able to apply academic discourse strategies within informal digital contexts, demonstrating emerging discourse competence and pragmatic awareness. The study highlights the pedagogical potential of digital platforms like YouTube as spaces for meaningful language use and suggests incorporating informal online texts into language teaching practices.

Publication Info

Volume / Issue
Vol. 1, No. 2
Year
2025
Pages
63-82
Submitted
03 July 2025
Published
01 September 2025

Original Article

View this article on the original journal website for additional features and citation options.

View in OJS

Share

Publication History

Transparent editorial process timeline

Submitted

03 Jul 2025

Sent to Review

03 Jul 2025

Review Completed

18 Jul 2025

Review Completed

30 Jul 2025

Revisions Required

31 Jul 2025

Review Completed

05 Aug 2025

Editorial Decision

05 Aug 2025

Review Completed

15 Aug 2025

Accepted

18 Aug 2025

Sent to Production

20 Aug 2025

Published

01 Sep 2025