Published

Teachers’ Experiences Using ChatGPT for Lesson Planning in EFL Classrooms

Authors

1

Sirniawati Sirniawati

Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

2

Azran Azmee

Islamic University, Kushtia, Bangladesh

Abstract

This qualitative study explores EFL teachers’ experiences using ChatGPT for lesson planning, focusing on both practical interactions and reflective perceptions. Through semi-structured interviews with eight teachers, the research investigates how ChatGPT influences lesson design, professional identity, and pedagogical thinking. Findings reveal that ChatGPT enhances efficiency by providing immediate access to diverse resources and stimulates creativity by suggesting novel teaching ideas. However, teachers also face challenges related to the contextual relevance and accuracy of AI-generated content, requiring critical evaluation and adaptation to align with local curricula and student needs. Additionally, teachers experience a shift in professional identity, viewing themselves as collaborators with AI rather than sole content creators. This shift fosters deeper pedagogical reflection and more flexible lesson design practices. At the same time, concerns about over-dependence on AI and the potential loss of authenticity highlight important ethical and professional considerations. The study emphasizes the need for balanced and critical engagement with AI tools in EFL teaching, advocating for teacher training programs that address both technical and ethical dimensions. The findings contribute to understanding the complex role of AI in language education and suggest directions for future research on AI-supported teaching practices.

 

Publication Info

Volume / Issue
Vol. 1, No. 2
Year
2025
Pages
40-58
Submitted
20 June 2025
Published
12 November 2025

Original Article

View this article on the original journal website for additional features and citation options.

View in OJS

Share

Publication History

Transparent editorial process timeline

Submitted

20 Jun 2025

Sent to Review

30 Jun 2025

Review Completed

19 Aug 2025

Review Completed

26 Aug 2025

Resubmit

26 Aug 2025

Editorial Decision

20 Oct 2025

Review Completed

23 Oct 2025

Review Completed

28 Oct 2025

Accepted

28 Oct 2025

Sent to Production

28 Oct 2025

Published

12 Nov 2025