Published

Analisis Perbandingan Materi Ekspor Impor Dalam Buku IPS Kelas VI Pada Kurikulum KTSP dan Kurikulum Merdeka

Authors

1

Adinda Kusuma Mouristi

Institut Prima Bangsa

2

Sintiyani Fatikha Rizki

Institut Prima Bangsa

3

Firly Hernanda

Institut Prima Bangsa

Abstract

This study investigates the comparative presentation of export and import material in sixth-grade Social Studies (IPS) textbooks under the 2006 School-Based Curriculum (KTSP) and the 2022 Independent Curriculum (Kurikulum Merdeka). The research employs a qualitative descriptive method, focusing on content analysis of two government-issued textbooks to explore differences in structure, depth, pedagogical approach, and visual representation. Findings reveal that the KTSP textbook delivers content in a compartmentalized and structured manner, emphasizing conceptual mastery through explicit maps and thematic separation of social and economic aspects. In contrast, the Independent Curriculum adopts an integrated, narrative, and project-based approach through IPAS textbooks, merging science and social studies to foster contextual understanding and critical thinking. However, the lack of concept maps and explicit economic focus in the IPAS book poses pedagogical challenges. The study concludes that curriculum design significantly influences students’ comprehension of global economic concepts and highlights the need for textbooks to align with curriculum philosophy, offer relevant examples, and support 21st-century skills. This research contributes to curriculum development discourse by emphasizing the importance of contextual and integrated textbook design in enhancing economic literacy among elementary students.

Publication Info

Volume / Issue
Vol. 1, No. 2
Year
2025
Pages
21-30
Submitted
16 June 2025
Published
01 February 2025

Original Article

View this article on the original journal website for additional features and citation options.

View in OJS

Share

Publication History

Transparent editorial process timeline

Published

01 Feb 2025

Submitted

16 Jun 2025

Review Completed

18 Jun 2025

Sent to Review

18 Jun 2025

Review Completed

20 Jun 2025

Revisions Required

20 Jun 2025

Accepted

24 Jun 2025

Sent to Production

08 Jul 2025