Published

Analisis Konten Komparatif Bahan Ajar IPA Tata Surya: Studi Kritis Kurikulum KTSP-Merdeka

Authors

1

Sintiyani Fatikha Rizki

Institut Prima Bangsa

2

Adinda Kusuma Mouristi

Institut Prima Bangsa

3

Firly Hernanda

Institut Prima Bangsa

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare science textbooks focused on the solar system for fourth-grade elementary school students. A literature review identifies several essential criteria that quality textbooks must fulfill. If deficiencies are found, revisions are necessary to ensure effective teaching. Science textbooks should also include activities that promote critical thinking among students. The research evaluates the content feasibility, language use, and presentation suitability of science textbooks aligned with the KTSP and Merdeka Curriculum regarding solar system material. A qualitative descriptive approach is employed, concentrating on science textbooks about the solar system for fourth-grade students. Data collection involves observation, documentation, and analysis of errors and conceptual accuracy within the textbooks. The findings reveal minor errors in the KTSP textbooks, particularly in language and presentation aspects. In contrast, the Merdeka Curriculum textbooks are deemed suitable as learning resources for sixth-grade students. Their comprehensive content, simple and understandable language, and engaging, interactive presentation make these books effective in supporting the learning process. Overall, the Merdeka Curriculum textbooks are more appropriate than the KTSP textbooks as teaching materials for elementary science.

Publication Info

Volume / Issue
Vol. 1, No. 2
Year
2025
Pages
12-20
Submitted
15 June 2025
Published
01 February 2025

Original Article

View this article on the original journal website for additional features and citation options.

View in OJS

Share

Publication History

Transparent editorial process timeline

Published

01 Feb 2025

Submitted

15 Jun 2025

Sent to Review

18 Jun 2025

Review Completed

20 Jun 2025

Review Completed

21 Jun 2025

Revisions Required

21 Jun 2025

Accepted

23 Jun 2025

Sent to Production

08 Jul 2025